Your activity: 14076 p.v.
your limit has been reached. plz Donate us to allow your ip full access, Email: [email protected]

Evaluation and management of supracondylar fractures in children

Evaluation and management of supracondylar fractures in children
Author:
Leticia Manning Ryan, MD, MPH, FAAP
Section Editor:
Kathy Boutis, MD, FRCPC, FAAP, MSc
Deputy Editor:
James F Wiley, II, MD, MPH
Literature review current through: Feb 2022. | This topic last updated: Feb 07, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Supracondylar fractures are the most common pediatric elbow fracture and carry significant potential for neurovascular compromise [1-4]. These fractures of the distal humerus are frequently problematic in terms of diagnosis, treatment, and complications [1]. Proper care requires appropriate assessment and prompt orthopedic care for those patients whose fractures pose the greatest risk for long-term complications.

This topic will discuss the evaluation and treatment of supracondylar fractures in children. Other distal humeral fractures are discussed separately. (See "Evaluation and management of condylar elbow fractures in children" and "Epicondylar and transphyseal elbow fractures in children".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — Supracondylar fractures account for up to 60 percent of pediatric elbow fractures [4]. They occur most frequently in children between two and seven years of age [5]. Supracondylar fractures result from a fall on an outstretched arm in up to 70 percent of patients [6]. The nondominant extremity is most commonly affected. Children under three years of age typically sustain a supracondylar fracture after a fall from a height of less than 3 feet (eg, fall from a bed or couch). Most fractures in older children result from higher falls from playground equipment (eg, monkey bars, swings) or other high energy mechanism [7].

PERTINENT ANATOMY

Bone — In children, the supracondylar region encompasses an area of thin, weak bone located in the distal humerus. This region is bordered posteriorly by the olecranon fossa and anteriorly by the coronoid fossa (figure 1). The medial and lateral aspects of the supracondylar region extend distally to the developing medial and lateral condyles and epicondyles.

When a child falls onto an outstretched arm with the elbow in hyperextension, the force of the fall is transmitted through the olecranon to the weak supracondylar region, causing a supracondylar fracture. Depending on the severity of the fracture, posterior displacement of the distal fracture fragment and anterior displacement of the proximal fracture fragment may occur (figure 2). The fracture line typically propagates transversely across the distal humerus through the center of the olecranon fossa (image 1). (See 'Supracondylar fracture classification' below.)

Soft tissue structures — In more severe supracondylar fractures (especially type III), the proximal fragment of the distal fractured humerus is driven anteriorly into soft tissue structures with potential impingement on important blood vessels and nerves. (See 'Supracondylar fracture classification' below.)

Vascular anatomy — The brachial artery is superficial to the brachialis muscle along the anteromedial aspect of the humerus. As the brachial artery passes anterior to the distal humerus, an extensive collateral circulation develops. As the artery extends into the forearm, it splits into the radial and ulnar artery (figure 3).

In patients with posterolateral displacement of a supracondylar fracture, the brachial artery may be injured when the proximal fragment of the fractured humerus moves medially, piercing the brachialis muscle and reaching the brachial artery (figure 4). In addition, the brachial artery may be tethered to the sharp edge of the proximal fracture fragment by the supratrochlear branch of the anterior ulnar recurrent artery, thereby increasing the risk of brachial artery injury during movement of the injured arm or fracture manipulation (figure 5).

"Scraping" of the brachial artery by the bony fragment may result in intimal damage to the vessel. This injury may subsequently lead to thrombosis and vascular insufficiency. Because of the extensive collateral circulation present at the elbow, it is rare for ischemia of the arm to occur from complete brachial artery occlusion [8]. Median nerve injury often accompanies brachial artery impingement.

Nerve anatomy — Following a displaced supracondylar fracture, the median (including the anterior interosseous nerve branch), radial, and ulnar nerves are at potential risk for injury (figure 3). Although nerve injuries may rarely be associated with long term sequelae, the majority are neurapraxias, such as temporary loss of nerve function (especially motor function) without anatomical nerve disruption [9,10].

The median nerve crosses the elbow joint with the brachial artery. Posterolateral distal fracture fragment displacement with medial movement of the proximal fracture fragment puts the median nerve and its anterior interosseous nerve branch at the greatest risk of injury (figure 4).

Median nerve injury results in weakness of the flexor muscles of the hand and loss of two-point sensation on the palmar surface of the thumb and the index and middle fingers [10]. The anterior interosseous nerve (AION) is the branch of the median nerve most commonly injured (figure 3) [9-11]. The AION lacks a superficial sensory component [9,10]. Children and adolescents with AION syndrome initially have proximal forearm pain followed by weakness in the hand with no sensory deficits. On physical examination they have a weak "OK" sign and/or a lack of distal interphalangeal flexion when making an "OK" sign (eg, more of a pincer grasp than an "OK" sign) (picture 1). (See 'Neurologic deficit' below.)

The radial nerve runs between the brachialis and brachioradialis muscles before crossing the elbow and penetrating the supinator muscle. Posteromedial distal fracture fragment displacement increases the chance of radial nerve impingement because of lateral proximal fracture fragment displacement (figure 4) [12]. Injury to the radial nerve results in weakness of wrist extension, hand supination, and thumb extension. In addition, altered sensation is found in the dorsal web space between the thumb and index finger.

The ulnar nerve crosses the elbow posterior to the medial epicondyle and is typically not affected with extension type supracondylar fractures. However, it is prone to injury following flexion type supracondylar fractures (figure 6) [8]. Ulnar nerve injury causes weakness of wrist flexion and adduction, finger spread, and flexion of the distal phalanx of the fifth digit (pinky or little finger). These motor findings are accompanied by altered sensation of the ulnar side of the ring (fourth digit) and little fingers.

MECHANISM OF INJURY — In general, fractures of the distal humerus are most commonly due to a fall on an outstretched hand (FOOSH) or direct trauma to the elbow [6]. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)

Extension and flexion are the two major types of supracondylar fracture and each has a characteristic mechanism of injury [3,8].

Extension fractures account for approximately 95 percent of supracondylar fractures and typically result from a FOOSH mechanism with the elbow hyperextended [3,9]. The distal condylar complex may then shift in either the posterolateral or posteromedial direction (figure 4).

Supracondylar flexion fractures account for 5 percent of supracondylar fractures. In contrast to extension injuries, these fractures result from a direct blow to the posterior aspect of the flexed elbow. In these cases, the distal condylar complex is more likely to displace in the anterolateral direction (figure 6) [3,8,13].

PHYSICAL FINDINGS — The child with a supracondylar fracture typically has elbow pain, swelling, and very limited to no range of motion at the elbow [8]. The clinician must rapidly assess the injury to identify degree of fracture displacement, neurovascular compromise, and evidence of compartment syndrome.

One approach is to initially inspect the affected arm and perform a brief neurovascular examination followed by a more complete evaluation once pain is controlled and radiographs have been obtained. The clinician should not encourage active or passive elbow movement in a patient with a suspected supracondylar fracture until a displaced fracture has been excluded by radiography. Patients with an obviously displaced supracondylar fracture require initial immobilization before radiography is performed. (See 'Neurovascular examination' below and 'Analgesia and immobilization' below.)

Inspection — The clinician should carefully inspect the anterior and posterior arm for wounds that indicate an open fracture while limiting movement of the injured arm. In patients transferred by ambulance or from another hospital, this task often requires careful removal of previously applied immobilization devices. Open supracondylar fractures often manifest as a puncture wound or laceration in or just above the antecubital region.

Displaced fractures may have an "S-shaped" configuration or dimpling in the antecubital fossa associated with marked swelling about the elbow (figure 7 and figure 8).

Ecchymosis over the anteromedial aspect of the forearm suggests brachial artery injury [8].

Nondisplaced fractures may have minimal swelling, but observation will show that the child is not using the affected arm normally. Posterior distal humeral palpation is usually painful in these patients.

Neurovascular examination — A complete neurovascular evaluation includes an assessment of radial and brachial pulses and the sensory and motor function of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves (table 1) [14]. Patients with a normal initial neurovascular examination warrant regular repeated evaluation, especially immediately following splinting, fracture manipulation, or movement of the affected extremity.

Pulse — The clinician should compare the radial and brachial pulse with the opposite limb. Initially symmetric and equal pulses with normal perfusion and skin warmth are reassuring but do not entirely exclude vascular injury. However, patients who maintain normal pulse and perfusion over time are unlikely to have a brachial artery injury.

If a radial or brachial pulse is not palpable, a Doppler ultrasound should be used to determine the presence of distal perfusion. Pulse oximetry may also provide evidence of pulsatile flow as well as degree of oxygenation distal to the injury. If the pulse oximetry provides a wave form and oxygen saturation, then it can be used to provide continuous information on distal extremity perfusion.

Perfusion — Brisk capillary refill, normal color, and a warm hand indicate the presence of some distal perfusion, even when distal pulses are diminished or absent. Maintenance of perfusion despite abnormal pulses often arises from brachial artery spasm that typically resolves after urgent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.

However, diminished or absent pulses in association with poor distal perfusion, pallor, and a cool hand are concerning signs of ischemia, especially in association with pain upon passive extension of the fingers. Patients with these findings warrant emergent intervention to reestablish limb perfusion [15]. (See 'Compartment syndrome' below and 'Absent pulse' below.)

Neurologic function — The clinician should evaluate the sensory and motor function of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves while minimizing patient discomfort (table 1). In a patient with an extremely painful injury, analgesia (eg, intravenous morphine 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg, maximum single dose: 10 mg) prior to examination is necessary to enable the child to cooperate with the examination.

The following tests establish motor function of the major nerves while minimizing extremity movements (see 'Nerve anatomy' above):

"OK" sign (alternatively, ask the patient to pinch your hand): anterior interosseous nerve (branch of median nerve) and radial nerve (picture 1) [9,10]

Finger spread against resistance or holding a piece of paper firmly between the middle and ring fingers: ulnar nerve (figure 9)

Thumb's up sign: radial nerve (figure 10)

The clinician should perform testing of two point discrimination (ie, the ability to recognize two points five millimeters apart applied simultaneously to the skin as distinct from a single point) on the follow sites to evaluate peripheral nerve sensation:

Dorsal web space – Innervated by the radial nerve

Palmar index (pointer) finger – Innervated by the median nerve

Pinky (or little finger) – Innervated by the ulnar nerve

Although nerve injuries may rarely be associated with long term sequelae, the majority are neurapraxias, ie, temporary loss of nerve function (especially motor function) without anatomical nerve disruption [9,10].

Compartment syndrome — The following findings suggest a developing compartment syndrome:

Excessive swelling and ecchymosis at the elbow [3]

Increasing forearm pain

Increased pain upon passive extension of the fingers

Cold hand with poor perfusion, pallor, and diminished or absent pulse (late finding)

Compartment syndrome may occur prior to or after definitive orthopedic care but is rare (<1 percent of patients) [7]. It is more common in children with supracondylar fracture who also have a forearm fracture. Once the clinician suspects an acute compartment syndrome, compartment pressures must be measured to determine whether they are elevated, or a clinical decision to perform a fasciotomy is needed. (See "Acute compartment syndrome of the extremities", section on 'Management'.)

Associated injuries — Forearm and wrist fractures occasionally complicate supracondylar fractures in children [16]. Thus, the forearm and wrist warrant careful inspection for swelling and/or deformity and palpation for bony tenderness. If there is any clinical concern for fractures of the forearm or wrist, radiographs of these areas should also be ordered. In addition, shoulder and clavicle injuries may occur, and any deformity, swelling, or bony tenderness in these areas warrants radiographic investigation.

Most supracondylar fractures result from falls on an outstretched arm and are not associated with multiple trauma. However, children who fall from a height greater than three times their standing height or 10 feet, whichever is less, are at increased risk for multiple trauma to the head, thorax, and abdomen and may warrant, in addition to a complete physical examination, appropriate ancillary studies. (See "Approach to the initially stable child with blunt or penetrating injury", section on 'Blunt trauma' and "Trauma management: Approach to the unstable child", section on 'Initial approach'.)

RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT — All patients with a suspected supracondylar fracture should receive a general assessment as well as a focused physical examination of the involved extremity. (See 'Physical findings' above and "Procedural sedation in children outside of the operating room".)

Radiologic technique — Appropriate analgesia should be provided BEFORE extremity radiographs are obtained. When obtaining radiographs in the child with a supracondylar fracture, the goal is to obtain the necessary films with minimal movement of the extremity. Excessive manipulation of the extremity during radiologic procedures may further exacerbate or precipitate neurovascular injury, especially in patients with an unstable type II or type III supracondylar fracture.

In patients with evidence of severe fracture (S-shape configuration or pucker sign, (figure 7 and figure 8)), splinting is advisable prior to obtaining radiographs. Alternatively, the clinician and an assistant may accompany the patient and assist with positioning of the obviously deformed extremity while ensuring neurovascular status does not deteriorate. (See 'Analgesia and immobilization' below.)

In patients without obvious deformity, a sling typically provides adequate support for nondisplaced fractures and allows for radiographs to be obtained more easily.

Radiographic views — Radiographic assessment of suspected supracondylar fracture requires a true lateral of the elbow with the humerus in anatomic position (figure 11 and image 2 and image 3).

Because of the association of supracondylar fractures with forearm fractures, appropriate radiographs of the forearm are warranted in patients with clinical findings suggestive of fracture to these areas.

Proximal humerus, clavicle, and wrist radiographs may also be necessary depending on the patient's physical findings. (See 'Associated fractures' below.)

Ultrasound with Doppler flow should be performed in children with evidence of vascular injury (eg, decreased or absent radial pulse) [17].

Supracondylar fracture classification — Extension type supracondylar fractures may be further classified according to the Gartland classification system [14].

Type I – Gartland type I supracondylar fracture describes a nondisplaced or minimally displaced (<2 mm) fracture with radiographic evidence of elbow effusion (anterior sail and/or posterior fat pad signs). Because the anterior and posterior periosteum remains intact, the anterior humeral line transects the middle third of the capitellum (image 4). (See "Elbow anatomy and radiographic diagnosis of elbow fracture in children", section on 'Fat pads'.)

Type II – Gartland type II supracondylar fracture refers to a displaced (>2 mm) fracture with an intact posterior periosteum. In contrast to type I fractures, the anterior humeral line is displaced anteriorly, either hitting the anterior third of the capitellum or missing it entirely, indicating posterior displacement of the distal humeral fracture. In most children, the fracture line is clearly seen and "hinging" of the posterior periosteum and posterior displacement of the distal fracture fragment may occur (image 5 and image 6). (See "Elbow anatomy and radiographic diagnosis of elbow fracture in children", section on 'Anterior humeral line'.)

Type III – Gartland type III supracondylar fracture is a displaced fracture with disrupted anterior and posterior periosteum. This injury results in no continuity between the proximal and distal fracture fragments. Type III fractures may be displaced in three directions: posteromedial (the most common pattern), posterolateral, or anterolateral. The direction of displacement is important in determining which neurovascular structures are at greatest risk for injury (image 7 and figure 4) [3]. (See 'Soft tissue structures' above.)

Associated fractures — Supracondylar fractures are associated with forearm or distal radius fractures in up to 5 percent of cases. The combination of supracondylar and forearm fractures increases the possibility of compartment syndrome [8,18]. Clinicians should have a low threshold to also obtain radiographs of the forearm in patients with supracondylar fractures, especially if there is a concern of this associated fracture on clinical examination or a complete examination is not possible (eg, younger child) [14].

Proximal humerus, clavicle, and wrist fractures may also occur with a supracondylar fracture. Deformity and/or bony tenderness during physical examination dictate appropriate radiographic assessment of these areas in selected patients (image 8 and table 2).

TREATMENT

Absent pulse — The emergency clinician should promptly identify children with vascular insufficiency and obtain an emergency consult with an orthopedic surgeon with appropriate pediatric expertise. Rarely, these children will require partial closed reduction in the emergency department in an attempt to restore distal circulation prior to closed or open reduction and stabilization in the operating room (figure 12) [14,19]. Patients who display a cold, white or cyanotic hand despite reduction attempts warrant operative exploration of the brachial artery and vascular repair [20].

Acute compartment syndrome — Compartment syndrome may occur prior to or after definitive orthopedic care. It is more common in children with supracondylar fracture who also have a forearm fracture. Suspected compartment syndrome should prompt measurement of compartment pressure and/or emergent consultation with an orthopedic surgeon with pediatric expertise. (See 'Compartment syndrome' above and "Acute compartment syndrome of the extremities", section on 'Measurement of compartment pressures'.)

Once confirmed by compartment pressure measurement or by clinical examination by an orthopedic surgeon, immediate management of suspected acute compartment syndrome includes relieving all external pressure on the compartment. Any dressing, splint, cast, or other restrictive covering should be removed. The limb should NOT be elevated. Elevation can diminish arterial inflow and exacerbate ischemia. Analgesics should be given. Definitive treatment consists of fasciotomy to decompress all involved compartments. (See "Acute compartment syndrome of the extremities", section on 'Management'.)

Analgesia and immobilization — For children with adequate distal circulation and no sign of compartment syndrome, initial therapy consists of pain management and immobilization to prevent further distraction of the fracture [3].

Parenteral analgesia (eg, intravenous morphine 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg, maximum single dose: 10 mg) is most appropriate for initial pain control in patients with moderate to severe pain and should be given prior to radiographic evaluation. Oral analgesia (eg, ibuprofen 10 mg/kg) may suffice for patients who have suffered a nondisplaced supracondylar fracture. In most circumstances, pain relief will result in an improved ability to assess neurovascular status in the apprehensive child.

Immobilization is particularly important prior to radiographs in children with significantly deformed fractures. Splinting avoids additional soft tissue injury from inadvertent arm movement. In this situation, the arm should be splinted "as it lies" (typically with elbow flexed 20 to 30 degrees) using prefabricated splinting material or eight layers of plaster with under cast padding (eg, Webril). A loosely applied elastic bandage (eg, Ace wrap) holds the splint in place. Neurovascular status should be checked before and after splinting. If any further compromise is found after immobilization, then the splinting material should be removed and the arm position adjusted. (See 'Absent pulse' above and 'Radiologic technique' above.)

Orthopedic consultation — Prompt orthopedic consultation should be obtained in any of the following circumstances:

Open supracondylar fracture

Fracture with neurovascular compromise

Type II or type III supracondylar fracture

Supracondylar fracture with evidence of compartment syndrome

DEFINITIVE CARE — Initial treatment varies for each type of supracondylar fracture:

Type I fracture — Patients with a nondisplaced Type I fracture (image 4) may be immobilized using either a collar and cuff sling or a posterior splint and sling. If a posterior splint is placed, it should extend from the wrist to the axilla, with the elbow at 90 degrees of flexion and the forearm in neutral position with respect to supination and pronation [15,21].

One randomized trial of 50 children found that those immobilized initially in a posterior splint and sling returned to normal activity sooner than those immobilized in a collar and cuff sling (median two versus seven days, p≤0.01) [21]. The study found no difference between the two groups in daily pain scores or in resumption of normal activity or mobility at two weeks.

Posterior splinting is probably sufficient for most children with type I supracondylar fractures [22]. If performed, circumferential casting and extremes of flexion should be initially avoided in most cases to decrease the incidence of compartment syndrome and vascular compromise [9,23].

The typical duration of immobilization for nondisplaced type I supracondylar fractures is three weeks [24].

Type II fracture — Type II fractures (image 5 and image 6) require orthopedic consultation for the determination of appropriate intervention (closed versus open reduction with percutaneous pin placement). Most pediatric orthopedists now recommend closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation [8].

Type III fracture — Type III supracondylar fractures (image 7) require orthopedic consultation for the determination of appropriate intervention (closed versus open reduction with percutaneous pin placement) [3].

FOLLOW-UP CARE — Children with nondisplaced or minimally displaced (<2 mm) fractures (eg, Gartland type I fractures) do not require immediate orthopedic evaluation. After splinting, these patients may be referred for follow up within seven days of the injury. The family should be instructed to return immediately for signs of unmanageable pain or compartment syndrome. (See 'Compartment syndrome' above and 'Supracondylar fracture classification' above.)

Almost all children with displaced supracondylar fractures (eg, Gartland type II and III fractures) require open or closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Hospital admission for monitoring of pulses, nerve function, and forearm compartments is also typical. After discharge, the patient is maintained in a splint or cast with percutaneous pins. Repeat radiographs are obtained on a regular basis to assess bone healing. Pins are removed when the distal humerus is no longer tender, usually in three to four weeks [8].

After pin and cast removal, motion exercises may be recommended as tolerated. Studies of children with supracondylar fractures and no neurovascular deficit suggest that formal physical therapy does not appear to improve long term mobility [25]. However, physical therapy is recommended for children with persistent contractures after three to four months or nerve deficits.

COMPLICATIONS — Complications of supracondylar fractures include vascular insufficiency, forearm compartment syndrome resulting in Volkmann's ischemic contracture, nerve injury, and cubitus varus deformity.

Vascular injury — Absence of the radial pulse is reported in 6 to 20 percent of all supracondylar fractures [26,27]. Vascular injury is most common with type II and III supracondylar fractures (figure 4) [13,28]. The brachial artery is most frequently injured in posterolaterally displaced fractures [13]. Patients without significant improvement in pulse or Doppler pulse after orthopedic care warrant emergent vascular exploration, especially if perfusion is not restored or if intractable pain suggestive of ischemia is present [4,17,28-30]:

A systematic review of 161 children with supracondylar fractures and a pulseless hand found that closed reduction and percutaneous pinning resulted in return of the radial pulse in 51 percent (82 of 161) of cases [28]. Sixty-three of 79 children with persistent pulseless hand after operative care underwent vascular exploration. Brachial artery injury or thrombus was found in 61 patients (97 percent).

An observational study of 19 children who had a perfused but pulseless hand after operative fixation found that the eight children who also had a median and/or anterior interosseus nerve deficit demonstrated entrapment of both the brachial artery and the median nerve at the fracture site [29]. Among the 11 children who were treated with closed reduction followed by observation, four patients underwent secondary exploration between two days and three weeks after injury; the brachial artery was running through the fracture site in all patients and one developed a persistent median nerve deficit.

An observational study of 26 children who had a pink pulseless hand after initial treatment of a supracondylar fracture found that the 23 children who presented four days to one year after injury and did not have early release of brachial artery obstruction developed ischemic contractions of hand and/or forearm muscles [30]. They also had 56 nerve injuries of which 41 were directly attributable to muscle ischemia and compression. Approximately half of these nerve injuries responded to late operative exploration.

Volkmann ischemic contracture — Vascular injury and primary swelling from the injury can lead to the development of compartment syndrome within 12 to 24 hours [15]. If a compartment syndrome is not treated in a timely manner, the associated ischemia and infarction may progress to Volkmann's ischemic contracture: fixed flexion of the elbow, pronation of the forearm, flexion at the wrist, and joint extension of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint [15].

Neurologic deficit — The frequency of neurologic deficit after supracondylar fractures is 10 to 20 percent and increases in some series of children with type III supracondylar fractures to as high as 49 percent [7,12,27,31,32].

Posterolateral distal fracture fragment displacement with medial movement of the proximal fracture fragment puts the median nerve and its anterior interosseous nerve branch at the greatest risk of injury (figure 4).

Posteromedial distal fracture fragment displacement increases the chance of radial nerve impingement because of lateral proximal fracture fragment displacement (figure 4).

Ulnar nerve injuries are most commonly associated with flexion type supracondylar fractures (figure 6) [11,31,32].

Although nerve injuries may be associated with long-term sequelae, the majority are neurapraxias that will resolve within two to three months [9,32,33]. Surgical exploration should be considered for nerve deficits that persist beyond three months [8,12,25].

Cubitus varus deformity — Angular deformity (cubitus varus or "gunstock" deformity) is a long term complication of a supracondylar fracture (figure 13). In contrast to the proximal humeral physis, the distal humerus physis contributes little (15 to 20 percent) to the overall longitudinal growth of the humerus [34]. Thus, remodeling and correction of fracture angulation is limited for children with supracondylar fractures.

Modern surgical techniques (eg, closed reduction with percutaneous pinning) have reduced the frequency of cubitus varus from 58 to approximately 3 percent of children treated for supracondylar fractures [6]. Cubitus varus deformity is mainly cosmetic and function is usually preserved [4]. However, it is rarely associated with an ulnar nerve palsy that may present many years after the original fracture [35].

Fishtail deformity — Fishtail deformities refer to the appearance of the distal humerus after fracture healing that is complicated by lateral trochlear avascular necrosis [36]. Patients typically present years after the initial injury with elbow pain. Associated abnormalities include elbow joint space narrowing, synovitis, osteophytes, and radial head subluxation. Fishtail deformities are most common after supracondylar fractures but may also occur after condylar fractures (image 9). (See "Evaluation and management of condylar elbow fractures in children", section on 'Complications'.)

OUTCOMES — Although immediate complications of distal humeral fractures are common in the pediatric population, the prognosis for long term outcome and function is good if the fracture is appropriately diagnosed and treated [37]. Many of the associated complications either are self-limited or are amenable to functional repair with surgical intervention.

For instance, vascular insufficiency often resolves after orthopedic alignment with percutaneous pinning. Similarly, nerve injury typically results from neurapraxia, ie, temporary nerve dysfunction that resolves without long term effects [9,33,38]. In addition, joint stiffness may also be treated surgically in most cases [3,39].

In a prospective study of 108 supracondylar fractures with complete follow up, 99 children had an excellent outcome, five had a good outcome, and four had a poor outcome. The poor results were attributed to technical errors in reduction resulting in an unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome but good function [40].

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION — Several UpToDate topics provide additional information about fractures, including the physiology of fracture healing, how to describe radiographs of fractures to consultants, acute and definitive fracture care (including how to make a cast), and the complications associated with fractures. These topics can be accessed using the links below:

(See "General principles of fracture management: Bone healing and fracture description".)

(See "General principles of fracture management: Fracture patterns and description in children".)

(See "General principles of definitive fracture management".)

(See "General principles of acute fracture management".)

(See "General principles of fracture management: Early and late complications".)

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: General management of pediatric fractures" and "Society guideline links: Upper extremity, thoracic, and facial fractures in children" and "Society guideline links: Acute pain management".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, “The Basics” and “Beyond the Basics.” The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on “patient info” and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topics (see "Patient education: Cast and splint care (The Basics)" and "Patient education: Elbow fracture in children (The Basics)")

Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient education: Cast and splint care (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In children, the supracondylar region encompasses an area of thin, weak bone located in the distal posterior humerus. Fracture in this region is common after a fall on an outstretched hand and may lead to neurovascular compromise. In particular, the anterior interosseous branch of the median nerve and the brachial artery are at risk of injury. (See 'Epidemiology' above and 'Pertinent anatomy' above.)

Clinical findings

The child with a supracondylar fracture typically has elbow pain, swelling, and very limited to no range of motion at the elbow. The clinician must rapidly assess the injury to identify neurovascular compromise, evidence of compartment syndrome, and degree of fracture displacement. (See 'Physical findings' above.)

Appropriate analgesia should be provided BEFORE extremity radiographs are obtained. Radiographic assessment of suspected supracondylar fracture requires a true lateral of the elbow, if permitted by the patient's clinical condition, with the humerus in anatomic position and an anteroposterior (AP) projection of the distal humerus (table 2 and image 3 and figure 11). (See 'Radiographic assessment' above and "Elbow anatomy and radiographic diagnosis of elbow fracture in children", section on 'Plain radiograph interpretation'.)

In patients with evidence of deformity or severe fracture (eg, S-shape configuration or pucker sign, (figure 7 and figure 8)), splinting is advisable prior to obtaining radiographs. (See 'Radiographic assessment' above and "Elbow anatomy and radiographic diagnosis of elbow fracture in children", section on 'Plain radiograph interpretation'.)

Clinicians should have a low threshold to also obtain radiographs of the forearm in patients with supracondylar fractures, especially if there is a concern of this associated fracture on clinical examination or a complete examination is not possible (eg, younger child). (See 'Associated injuries' above.)

Management

The emergency clinician should promptly identify children with vascular insufficiency and emergently involve an orthopedic surgeon with pediatric expertise. Rarely, these children will require partial closed reduction in the emergency department in an attempt to restore distal circulation (figure 12) [14]. Patients who display a cold, cyanotic hand despite reduction attempts require emergent operative exploration and vascular repair. (See 'Pulse' above and 'Perfusion' above and 'Absent pulse' above.)

Suspected compartment syndrome should prompt measurement of compartment pressure and/or emergent consultation with an orthopedic surgeon with appropriate pediatric expertise. Once confirmed by compartment pressure measurement, immediate management of suspected acute compartment syndrome includes relieving all external pressure on the compartment. Definitive treatment consists of fasciotomy to decompress all involved compartments. (See 'Compartment syndrome' above and "Acute compartment syndrome of the extremities", section on 'Measurement of compartment pressures'.)

For children with adequate distal circulation and no sign of compartment syndrome, initial therapy consists of pain management and immobilization to prevent further displacement of the fracture. (See 'Analgesia and immobilization' above.)

Emergent orthopedic consultation is indicated for children with an open fracture, neurovascular compromise, or acute compartment syndrome. In addition, prompt involvement of an orthopedic surgeon is necessary for operative care of a child with a Type II or Type III supracondylar fracture. Nondisplaced Type I supracondylar fractures are treated with a long arm splint with orthopedic follow up in one week. (See 'Supracondylar fracture classification' above and 'Neurologic deficit' above and 'Type I fracture' above and 'Type II fracture' above and 'Type III fracture' above.)

REFERENCES

  1. Bachman D, Santora S. Orthopedic trauma. In: Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Fleisher GR, Ludwig S, et al (Eds), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2006. p.1538.
  2. Della-Giustina K, Della-Giustina DA. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of pediatric orthopedic injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1999; 17:895.
  3. Carson S, Woolridge DP, Colletti J, Kilgore K. Pediatric upper extremity injuries. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006; 53:41.
  4. Lins RE, Simovitch RW, Waters PM. Pediatric elbow trauma. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30:119.
  5. Holt JB, Glass NA, Shah AS. Understanding the Epidemiology of Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in the United States: Identifying Opportunities for Intervention. J Pediatr Orthop 2018; 38:e245.
  6. Farnsworth CL, Silva PD, Mubarak SJ. Etiology of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1998; 18:38.
  7. Fletcher N, Schiller JR, Sumeet G, et al. Increased severity of type III supracondylar humeral fractures in the preteen population. J Pediatr 2012; 32:567.
  8. Baratz M, Micucci C, Sangimino M. Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Hand Clin 2006; 22:69.
  9. Villarin LA Jr, Belk KE, Freid R. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of elbow and forearm injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1999; 17:843.
  10. Jones ET, Louis DS. Median nerve injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; :181.
  11. Brown IC, Zinar DM. Traumatic and iatrogenic neurological complications after supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15:440.
  12. Campbell CC, Waters PM, Emans JB, et al. Neurovascular injury and displacement in type III supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15:47.
  13. Skaggs D, Pershad J. Pediatric elbow trauma. Pediatr Emerg Care 1997; 13:425.
  14. Shrader MW. Pediatric supracondylar fractures and pediatric physeal elbow fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2008; 39:163.
  15. Wu J, Perron AD, Miller MD, et al. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20:544.
  16. Rubinstein M, Hirway P, Zonfrillo MR. Identifying Risk Factors for Elbow Injury in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department With Distal Forearm Fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care 2021; 37:352.
  17. Benedetti Valentini M, Farsetti P, Martinelli O, et al. The value of ultrasonic diagnosis in the management of vascular complications of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B:694.
  18. Roposch A, Reis M, Molina M, et al. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus associated with ipsilateral forearm fractures in children: a report of forty-seven cases. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21:307.
  19. Delniotis I, Ktenidis K. The pulseless supracondylar humeral fracture: Our experience and a 1-year follow-up. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018; 85:711.
  20. Delniotis I, Delniotis A, Saloupis P, et al. Management of the Pediatric Pulseless Supracondylar Humeral Fracture: A Systematic Review and Comparison Study of "Watchful Expectancy Strategy" Versus Surgical Exploration of the Brachial Artery. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 55:260.
  21. Oakley E, Barnett P, Babl FE. Backslab versus nonbackslab for immobilization of undisplaced supracondylar fractures: a randomized trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 2009; 25:452.
  22. Cuomo AV, Howard A, Hsueh S, Boutis K. Gartland type I supracondylar humerus fractures in children: is splint immobilization enough? Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28:1150.
  23. McGraw JJ, Akbarnia BA, Hanel DP, et al. Neurological complications resulting from supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1986; 6:647.
  24. Green N, Van Zeeland N. Fractures and dislocations about the elbow. In: Skeletal Trauma in Children, 4th edition, Green N, Swiontowski (Eds), Elsevier, Philadelphia 2008. p.207.
  25. Keppler P, Salem K, Schwarting B, Kinzl L. The effectiveness of physiotherapy after operative treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25:314.
  26. Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90:1121.
  27. Garg S, Weller A, Larson AN, et al. Clinical characteristics of severe supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2014; 34:34.
  28. Griffin KJ, Walsh SR, Markar S, et al. The pink pulseless hand: a review of the literature regarding management of vascular complications of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36:697.
  29. Mangat KS, Martin AG, Bache CE. The 'pulseless pink' hand after supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children: the predictive value of nerve palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91:1521.
  30. Blakey CM, Biant LC, Birch R. Ischaemia and the pink, pulseless hand complicating supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91:1487.
  31. Kasser JR, Beaty JH. Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. In: Rockwood and Wilkins' Fractures in Children, 5th, Beaty JH, Kasser JR (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2001. p.577.
  32. Lyons ST, Quinn M, Stanitski CL. Neurovascular injuries in type III humeral supracondylar fractures in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; :62.
  33. Jones ET, Louis DS. Median nerve injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; :181.
  34. Price C, Phillips J, Devito D. Management of fractures. In: Lovell & Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics, 5th, Morrissey, Weinstein SL (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2001. p.1319.
  35. Abe M, Ishizu T, Shirai H, et al. Tardy ulnar nerve palsy caused by cubitus varus deformity. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20:5.
  36. Narayanan S, Shailam R, Grottkau BE, Nimkin K. Fishtail deformity--a delayed complication of distal humeral fractures in children. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 45:814.
  37. Sinikumpu JJ, Victorzon S, Pokka T, et al. The long-term outcome of childhood supracondylar humeral fractures: A population-based follow up study with a minimum follow up of ten years and normal matched comparisons. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B:1410.
  38. Lewine E, Kim JM, Miller PE, et al. Closed Versus Open Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children: A Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Presentation and Results. J Pediatr Orthop 2018; 38:77.
  39. Gogola GR. Pediatric humeral condyle fractures. Hand Clin 2006; 22:77.
  40. Mazda K, Boggione C, Fitoussi F, Penneçot GF. Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83:888.
Topic 6539 Version 30.0

References

1 : Bachman D, Santora S. Orthopedic trauma. In: Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Fleisher GR, Ludwig S, et al (Eds), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2006. p.1538.

2 : Emergency department evaluation and treatment of pediatric orthopedic injuries.

3 : Pediatric upper extremity injuries.

4 : Pediatric elbow trauma.

5 : Understanding the Epidemiology of Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in the United States: Identifying Opportunities for Intervention.

6 : Etiology of supracondylar humerus fractures.

7 : Increased severity of type III supracondylar humeral fractures in the preteen population

8 : Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

9 : Emergency department evaluation and treatment of elbow and forearm injuries.

10 : Median nerve injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

11 : Traumatic and iatrogenic neurological complications after supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

12 : Neurovascular injury and displacement in type III supracondylar humerus fractures.

13 : Pediatric elbow trauma.

14 : Pediatric supracondylar fractures and pediatric physeal elbow fractures.

15 : Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

16 : Identifying Risk Factors for Elbow Injury in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department With Distal Forearm Fractures.

17 : The value of ultrasonic diagnosis in the management of vascular complications of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

18 : Supracondylar fractures of the humerus associated with ipsilateral forearm fractures in children: a report of forty-seven cases.

19 : The pulseless supracondylar humeral fracture: Our experience and a 1-year follow-up.

20 : Management of the Pediatric Pulseless Supracondylar Humeral Fracture: A Systematic Review and Comparison Study of "Watchful Expectancy Strategy" Versus Surgical Exploration of the Brachial Artery.

21 : Backslab versus nonbackslab for immobilization of undisplaced supracondylar fractures: a randomized trial.

22 : Gartland type I supracondylar humerus fractures in children: is splint immobilization enough?

23 : Neurological complications resulting from supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

24 : Neurological complications resulting from supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

25 : The effectiveness of physiotherapy after operative treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

26 : Supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

27 : Clinical characteristics of severe supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

28 : The pink pulseless hand: a review of the literature regarding management of vascular complications of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

29 : The 'pulseless pink' hand after supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children: the predictive value of nerve palsy.

30 : Ischaemia and the pink, pulseless hand complicating supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood: long-term follow-up.

31 : Ischaemia and the pink, pulseless hand complicating supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood: long-term follow-up.

32 : Neurovascular injuries in type III humeral supracondylar fractures in children.

33 : Median nerve injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

34 : Median nerve injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

35 : Tardy ulnar nerve palsy caused by cubitus varus deformity.

36 : Fishtail deformity--a delayed complication of distal humeral fractures in children.

37 : The long-term outcome of childhood supracondylar humeral fractures: A population-based follow up study with a minimum follow up of ten years and normal matched comparisons.

38 : Closed Versus Open Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children: A Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Presentation and Results.

39 : Pediatric humeral condyle fractures.

40 : Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients.