INTRODUCTION — This topic reviews the indications, contraindications, and steps for safe performance of procedural sedation in children undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, regardless of setting.
Preparation for procedural sedation, properties of specific agents, and strategies for selecting medications for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room are discussed separately:
●(See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
●(See "Pharmacologic agents for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
●(See "Selection of medications for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
BACKGROUND — The performance of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in children is safer and more likely to be successful when the patient's movement is limited and when any associated pain and anxiety are effectively controlled. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions that consider the child's developmental status and the clinical circumstances are often required to meet these goals. In addition, attention to the treatment of pain and anxiety associated with the child's condition is a requisite of acceptable and compassionate patient care. Specific issues related to the importance of addressing pain and anxiety in emergency medical systems has been emphasized in a clinical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) [1].
The increased availability of short-acting sedatives along with accurate noninvasive monitoring and improved sedation training programs has enabled effective and safe management of sedation and analgesia outside the operating room [2]. Procedural sedation is an evolving field practiced by a diverse group of practitioners in an expanding variety of clinical settings [3]. Among the challenges that must be addressed are the development of standardized definitions of outcomes, particularly with respect to what constitutes satisfactory sedation and what is an adverse event. In addition, there remain a number of guidelines for sedation promulgated by various specialty societies. Unified guidelines would encourage consistent care across specialties [4].
GOALS OF SEDATION AND ANALGESIA — Procedural sedation in children is performed by a wide range of providers, in a variety of settings, who use many different agents to facilitate the successful completion of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Outcomes for procedural sedation for elective and emergency procedures have been demonstrated to be excellent when performed by dedicated sedation providers and services [5-7].
Goals of sedation and analgesia for painful procedures are to [8]:
●Maintain patient safety and welfare
●Minimize physical pain and maximize patient comfort
●Control anxiety, minimize psychological trauma, maximize amnesia
●Control behavioral movement to allow safe performance of procedures
●Control hyperdynamic or vagal response to painful interventions
The clinician must determine the appropriate level of sedation and/or analgesia required for a particular procedure. In addition to medications, age-appropriate, non-pharmacological interventions should always be employed to maximize patient comfort [9-12]. (See 'Nonpharmacologic interventions' below.)
DEFINITIONS — For the purposes of this topic, we will use the following definitions regarding the depth of sedation (see "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Definitions'):
●Analgesia – Relief of pain without intentionally producing a sedated state. Altered mental status may be a secondary effect of medications administered for analgesia.
●Minimal sedation – The patient responds normally to verbal commands. Cognitive function and coordination may be impaired, but ventilatory and cardiovascular function is unaffected.
●Moderate sedation/analgesia – The patient has depression of consciousness but can respond purposefully to verbal commands either alone or accompanied by light touch. Maintains airway and adequate ventilation without intervention. Cardiovascular function is maintained.
●Deep sedation/analgesia – The patient cannot be easily aroused but responds purposefully to noxious stimulation. May require assistance to maintain airway and adequate ventilation. Cardiovascular function is usually maintained.
●General anesthesia – The patient cannot be aroused. Often requires assistance to maintain airway and positive pressure ventilation. Cardiovascular function may be impaired.
●Dissociative sedation – Sedation with ketamine represents an exception to the above sedation continuum. In contrast to other sedatives where deeper sedation can lead to a higher risk of respiratory suppression, ketamine sedation is characterized by a trance-like, cataleptic state in which the patient experiences profound analgesia and amnesia but generally retains airway protective reflexes, spontaneous respirations, and cardiopulmonary stability [13,14]. (See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Definitions'.)
"Procedural sedation" has been defined by the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation, which includes representatives from anesthesia, emergency medicine, critical care, pediatrics, dentistry, and gastroenterology, as "the administration of one or more pharmacological agents to facilitate a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure while targeting a state during which airway patency, spontaneous respiration, protective airway reflexes, and hemodynamic stability are preserved, while alleviating anxiety and pain" [15]. The progression from mild sedation to general anesthesia is a continuum, and patients can easily move from one "level" of sedation to another.
"Conscious sedation" is an outdated term that is sometimes used to refer to minimal or moderate sedation. Because effective sedation usually impairs consciousness, this term has been abandoned when referring to sedation states.
INDICATIONS — There are no absolute indications for the performance of procedural sedation in children. It may be used for any procedure in which a child's pain or anxiety may be excessive and movement may impede safe performance of the procedure or cause significantly negative emotional sequelae. The need for sedation will vary greatly with a child's developmental or behavioral status. Procedural sedation (at deep levels of sedation) can result in profound muscle relaxation, thereby increasing the successful completion of certain procedures such as the closed reduction of a dislocated joint or displaced fracture.
The targeted depth of sedation and the selection of medications largely depend upon the procedure performed including expected duration of sedation, the anticipated degree of pain, the experience and credentials of the sedation provider, and patient factors [3,8]. It is important to note that the depth of sedation targeted may not be the depth of sedation actually achieved. All sedation providers must be prepared to rescue patients when the actual depth of sedation exceeds the targeted depth of sedation. (See "Selection of medications for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
The properties of the specific agents with respect to pediatric sedation are listed in the tables and discussed in detail separately (table 1 and table 2). (See "Pharmacologic agents for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
A wide range of procedures may warrant sedation in children, including nonpainful imaging procedures (that require no movement), mildly painful procedures (eg, laceration repair), and moderately to severely painful procedures (eg, fracture reduction).
CONTRAINDICATIONS AND PRECAUTIONS — There are no absolute contraindications to procedural sedation outside the operating room in children.
Relative contraindications to procedural sedation include signs of a difficult airway or significant medical comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification III or higher). Those patients with ASA classes III, IV, and V (table 3), functional needs, or airway abnormalities warrant consultation with a pediatric anesthesiologist or clinician with similar pediatric sedation/anesthesia expertise. A history of severe sleep apnea or airway abnormality warrants special consideration when planning sedation care. Children who readily obstruct their airway when asleep may do so during sedation and are at risk for excessive response to sedative medications. (See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Risk classification' and "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Airway assessment'.)
True allergic reactions to commonly used sedation medications are rare. However, caregivers may report adverse events with specific classes of agents as follows [3]:
●Paradoxical reactions (patient becomes more agitated rather than sedated) may occur with benzodiazepines and barbiturates, especially in younger children.
●Morphine administration is associated with histamine release that may produce hives, especially in regions of the body where it is administered.
●Fentanyl is associated with nasal pruritus.
●Agitation with emergence has been described with ketamine, barbiturates, and other sedatives.
Of these, prior paradoxical reactions with benzodiazepines or emergence phenomenon after ketamine may warrant avoidance of these agents for sedation in individual patients.
Fasting status is not a contraindication to sedation for urgent or emergency procedures. However, the provider should evaluate the timing and nature of the last oral intake, the urgency of the procedure, and the risk for aspiration based upon procedural and patient factors (eg, children with higher ASA levels or abnormal airways are at greater risk for adverse events). All of these factors should be taken into consideration when determining the depth and length of procedural sedation outside of the operating room. (See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Urgent or emergency procedures'.)
PERFORMING PROCEDURAL SEDATION
Informed consent — Before performing procedural sedation, the clinician should obtain written informed consent from the caregiver. Key components of this consent include the following:
●Proposed benefits, typically the ability to perform a procedure effectively while minimizing pain, anxiety, and psychological trauma
●Possible risks, which are often agent specific, but commonly include potential for airway compromise, hypoxia, and vomiting
The consent process should include specific discussion of the drug options and potential routes of administration for procedural sedation as well as alternatives including local or regional anesthesia and, when appropriate, general anesthesia.
Preparation — Preparation for procedural sedation in children outside of the operating room is discussed in detail separately. (See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
Children undergoing procedural sedation should have assessment of the following (see "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Presedation evaluation'):
●Fasting status
●Focused medical examination with specific attention to the airway
●American Society of Anesthesiologists classification
●Previous history of sedation or general anesthesia and outcome
Clinicians who administer sedation must understand the pharmacology of the drugs they use and be comfortable choosing a procedural sedation plan for the patient. Because depression of consciousness is a continuum and responses to medications vary, clinicians must recognize that targeted and achieved depths of sedation may differ and be prepared to manage complications in patients whose level of sedation becomes deeper than intended or who experience an adverse reaction to medication. Competence in definitive emergency airway management is mandatory if deep sedation is intended or possible and is strongly advised for lighter levels.
Prior to the start of procedural sedation, the clinician should ensure that monitoring devices are present and functioning properly and that oxygen, oxygen delivery devices, suction equipment, pediatric airway equipment, an emergency cart with appropriate medications, and a defibrillator are immediately available. (See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Equipment'.)
Administration of sedation requires personnel with appropriate experience and training. (See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Personnel'.)
Preoxygenation — We suggest the use of supplemental oxygen with continuous capnography during procedural sedation. The accuracy of capnography in reflecting the patient's true partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) is variable and depends on positioning of the sensor, the nature of the patient's breathing (mouth versus nose), and the rapidity with which oxygen is being administered. However, capnography provides early warning of respiratory depression and apnea during procedural sedation. (See "Carbon dioxide monitoring (capnography)", section on 'Procedural sedation'.)
Significant practice variation exists regarding the use of preoxygenation and continuous supplemental oxygenation during procedural sedation. Although it is recommended for moderate sedation by the American Society of Anesthesiology [16,17], evidence is limited to show that preoxygenation or continuous administration of supplemental oxygen in children undergoing procedural sedation is associated with improved safety [18].
The potential benefits of preoxygenation include:
●Maximizing bloodstream oxygenation during procedural sedation [19]
●Maximizing lung storage of oxygen [19]
●Maintenance of oxygenation during periods of apnea [20]; for example, children who experience hypopnea or apnea during sedation will have a two- to four-minute delay in oxygen desaturation if they have received preoxygenation [21]
Potential harms of preoxygenation include:
●Unless capnography or direct visualization of chest wall movement occurs continuously throughout sedation, continuous supplemental oxygen [20]:
•Delays desaturation as measured by pulse oximetry
•Permits patients to maintain acceptable oxygen saturation despite significant hypoventilation
•May delay recognition of apnea unless capnography or direct visualization of chest wall movement occurs continuously throughout sedation
For these reasons, when preoxygenation and continuous supplemental oxygen is provided, then the patient also requires monitoring with continuous capnography or direct visualization of chest wall movement throughout sedation.
●Administration of supplemental oxygen to infants and young children may also increase anxiety prior to sedation caused by discomfort associated with the mode of delivery (eg, nasal prongs or face mask).
The use of oxygen in adults undergoing procedural sedation is discussed separately. (See "Procedural sedation in adults outside the operating room", section on 'Monitoring and preoxygenation'.)
Monitoring — Recommended monitoring during moderate to deep procedural sedation includes [3,8,21]:
●Continuous visual observation of face, mouth, and chest wall movement when feasible
●Initial and repeated measures of vital signs including repeated blood pressure measurements in patients receiving moderate or deep sedation or agents known to cause hemodynamic instability
●Continuous measurement of heart rate and pulse oximetry
●End tidal-carbon dioxide (ETCO2) detection for moderate sedation (when tolerated) and deep sedation
For children receiving moderate or deep sedation, we suggest capnography (ETCO2) throughout the procedure and during recovery. ETCO2 monitoring is increasingly available in many settings for nonintubated patients and may be helpful to assess ventilation during sedation and analgesia. Based upon trials in children and observational studies in children and adults, increases or decreases in ETCO2 may be detected in patients with respiratory depression before hypoventilation or hypoxemia is noted, particularly in those who are receiving supplemental oxygen. Although not always reflective of the patient's true PaCO2, ETCO2 permits more rapid detection of hypoventilation and apnea than clinical assessment alone. (See "Carbon dioxide monitoring (capnography)", section on 'Procedural sedation'.)
Vital signs consisting of heart rate, respirations, and blood pressure should be recorded at specific intervals, including [3]:
●Before starting the procedure
●After the administration of the sedative agent(s)
●At completion of the procedure
●During early recovery
●At completion of recovery
If deep sedation is targeted or if a patient has significant underlying illness, vital signs should be measured at least every five minutes.
Complications from sedation such as respiratory depression are most likely to occur within 5 to 10 minutes after administration of intravenous medication and immediately after the procedure when stimuli associated with the procedure are removed [3]. Thus, attention to the patient's breathing and monitoring should be especially close during these periods.
Bispectral index (BIS) is a measure of consciousness obtained by continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring of probes placed on the forehead. The EEG signal is processed by a proprietary computer algorithm. BIS was derived in adults and is used in some settings to monitor for awareness to anesthesia. It has a range of 0 (no brain activity) to 100 (alert). (See "Accidental awareness after general anesthesia", section on 'Brain monitoring'.)
BIS is not routinely recommended for monitoring of pediatric sedations outside of the operating room.
BIS is of uncertain value in monitoring children during procedural sedation because it varies in its prediction of sedation depth by patient age and sedative agent. As an example, in a combined analysis of four observational studies, BIS was found to differentiate light from moderate or deep sedation in children with reasonable sensitivity (74 to 83 percent) and specificity (78 to 84 percent). However, BIS differentiated moderate from deep sedation with poor sensitivity (58 to 71 percent) and specificity (57 to 66 percent) [22]. BIS values in children were lower in infants and patients who received opioids. BIS values did not correlate with sedation depth in children receiving ketamine.
Uncooperative child — As a practical consideration, unnecessary stimulation such as inflation of a blood pressure cuff, beginning a painful procedure, or familial separation may hinder the induction of sedation in a young or anxious child. For uncooperative children, our approach is to obtain a complete set of vital signs and monitor the child visually until the sedative drugs have begun to take effect. At this point, we begin monitoring of pulse oximetry, heart rate, and for children undergoing moderate or deep sedation, capnography with administration of nasal cannula oxygen. (See 'Preoxygenation' above.)
Sedation state — The "state" of a patient during a sedation refers to their overall status and multiple goals of sedation. Specifically, is the patient awake and crying/moving, or is the patient in a quiet, non-stressed state during the procedure? We suggest the use of the Pediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS) (table 4) to provide a simple means of effectively documenting and rapidly communicating the quality of pediatric sedation relative to the goals of sedation [23]. Derived from expert opinion and validated using a small sample of patients and observers with high inter- and intra-observer agreement, the PSSS takes no more than 10 minutes to teach and consists of six levels of sedation that report on patient behavior, patient interference with the procedure, need for restraint, and physiologic parameters.
Assignment of scores may occur at regular intervals (eg, every 5 to 10 minutes). If the PSSS is used routinely for specific procedures, it has the potential to confirm that conditions were acceptable for each patient’s sedation strategy. It may also offer a means to objectively compare different sedation techniques, including nonpharmacologic interventions, as part of quality improvement and clinical research efforts.
By contrast, scales that simply measure the depth of sedation track only one aspect of this practice because a patient does not necessarily need to be sedated deeply or at all to meet the goals of procedural sedation (see 'Goals of sedation and analgesia' above). Many of these scales also do not permit the definition of "dangerous" states where patient physiology is not under good control such as hypoxia, hypotension, or bradycardia.
Nonpharmacologic interventions — Nonpharmacologic interventions include behavioral and cognitive approaches [10,24-26]. For many children, the use of nonpharmacologic interventions may prevent the need for procedural sedation. In situations where the patient is conscious during the sedation, behavioral and cognitive approaches are complementary to pharmacologic interventions and should be used. These techniques also help to reduce preprocedural agitation which permits an easier transition to sedation, may reduce the amount of medication required for effective sedation, and may decrease the frequency of adverse events, including emergence phenomena. (See "Selection of medications for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room", section on 'Nonpharmacologic interventions'.)
Behavioral treatments include the techniques of desensitization, distraction, reinforcing coping skills, positive reinforcement, and relaxation [9,11].
●Desensitization allows for gradual, increasing exposure to the procedure over a period of time. This technique maintains anxiety at low levels and lessens the learned fear associated with the procedure. For example, children could be exposed to a "mock" magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner progressively over time to provide desensitization without the expense of reducing the availability of an actual MRI machine [27].
●Distraction techniques involve an age appropriate stimulus to use during the procedure, such as non-nutritive sucking in infants, bubble blowing, party blowers, listening to a book, counting, interactive toys, playing music through headphones, video games, video, or virtual reality [10,28,29]. In a randomized trial that included 240 children requiring laceration repair in an emergency department, distraction techniques were associated with a significant reduction in situational anxiety among older children and lower parental perception of pain and distress among younger children [30]. In a separate case series, the use of tablet computers with age-appropriate applications has been described as another distraction technique that is effective for completing short procedures in the emergency department [31]. These tablets have multi-touch displays capable of presenting various audiovisual media in the forms of books, movies, music and games in an intuitive, interactive format. They can be used for children of all developmental levels and abilities, with or without child life support, prior to and during the performance of a potentially painful or frightening procedure.
●Positive reinforcement involves providing patients with positive statements and rewards after undergoing a procedure.
●Relaxation techniques can be taught to reduce children's anxiety associated with procedures.
Child life specialists may be particularly helpful in the execution of some of the above techniques. They can [32]:
●Aid in the formation of trusting relationship between the patient, family and health care providers.
●Facilitate psychological preparation of pediatric patients for diagnostic/therapeutic procedures through provision of developmental appropriate information.
●Encourage questions and emotional expression.
●Coach children in the use of strategies such as breathing techniques, distraction and visual imagery, to decrease behavioral distress and pain experience.
Child life intervention has been shown to reduce anxiety, improve coping, provide a more positive experience for the patient and family, and decrease the need for sedation in procedures, resulting in lower risks for the patient and cost savings for the hospital [33-36].
Parental involvement enhances the impact of behavioral pain management if the parent is properly prepared for a positive role (eg, coached on language to use, taught distraction and coping skills techniques) [10,37]. In addition, parental anxiety is a predictor of child anxiety. Thus, management of parental anxiety is an important element in allaying a child's fears [11].
Cognitive approaches are also used to manage pain [9,37]. Providing the child with information about the procedure before it is started may help allay anxiety. The content of this preparation needs to be age appropriate. Child life programs frequently use "medical play," including exploration of medical equipment and dramatic play enacting clinical situations, to help patients cope with painful treatments [38].
Concrete hypnosis can also be used to help direct the patient's attention away from the procedure, and children can be taught positive statements that they can repeat to themselves when they feel anxious.
The reference provides a video demonstrating the use of nonpharmacologic approaches to reduce preprocedure anxiety [24].
Medication administration — The choice of agent and mode of administration vary according to patient factors, the type of procedure performed, and the anticipated degree of pain. (See "Selection of medications for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
Careful titration of the chosen medication is often necessary to safely achieve the desired depth of sedation. The dosing and method of administration for the medications commonly used for procedural sedation in children outside of the operating room are presented in the tables (table 1 and table 2) and discussed in detail separately. (See "Pharmacologic agents for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
RECOVERY CARE AND DISCHARGE CRITERIA — Monitoring should continue until the child meets criteria for safe discharge [39]. These criteria include:
●Airway patency and stable cardiovascular function
●Easy arousability with intact protective reflexes
●Ability to talk (if age-appropriate)
●Ability to sit up unaided (if age-appropriate) and maintain wakefulness
●Adequate hydration with management of any nausea or vomiting
●Appropriate management of any continued pain
Young infants or children who are handicapped should return to the level of responsiveness observed before sedation. The exact duration of recovery time will vary depending upon patient characteristics (eg, age or body mass index) and the sedative agent or agents used (table 1 and table 2). Of note, serious adverse effects, including hypoxia, stridor, or hypotension have been described during the recovery phase of procedural sedation [40]. Thus, close monitoring is required until these discharge criteria are met. Furthermore, the recovering child should be able to maintain the recovered, wakeful state for approximately 15 minutes prior to discharge to assure discharge is appropriate [41].
Because of the significant risk of apnea after sedation, term infants with postconceptual ages (PCA) ≤45 weeks and former premature infants with PCA <60 weeks should undergo prolonged observation of respiratory status prior to discharge [42]. The minimum duration of observation is derived from post-anesthesia experience in term and preterm infants and varies depending upon PCA, the medications used, and patient comorbidities (eg, anemia, apnea of prematurity, chronic lung disease, or neurologic disease):
●All infants term or preterm with PCA ≤45 weeks – 12 hours
●Preterm infants with PCA 46 to 60 weeks and significant comorbidities – 12 hours
●Healthy preterm infants with PCA 46 to 60 weeks – six hours (12 hours if given opioids or other medications with significant respiratory depressant effects)
Patients, who develop apnea during observation, warrant prolonged observation until they are free of apnea for at least 12 hours. In some patients with frequent apneic episodes, caffeine administration may be appropriate. (See "Management of apnea of prematurity", section on 'Methylxanthine therapy'.)
ADVERSE OUTCOMES — Adverse outcomes associated with procedural sedation for children are unlikely when standardized safe practices are observed [8]. In a report describing over 30,000 prospectively collected hospital-based pediatric sedation/anesthesia encounters from sedation services at multiple institutions with 77 percent of the sedations performed by anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, or intensivists, the overall incidence of adverse events (primarily transient oxygen desaturation, vomiting, and excessive secretions) was 3 percent [5]. Laryngospasm and apnea occurred less commonly and there were no deaths. One patient was successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Thus, adverse events are relatively common in pediatric procedural sedation, but when personnel rapidly respond and reverse the adverse event, deleterious outcomes are rare.
The consequences of an adverse event that is not immediately recognized and treated can be devastating. In one retrospective report describing adverse sedation events in children, the deleterious outcomes of permanent neurologic injury or death was associated with adverse events that occurred in nonhospital-based facilities and with those for which resuscitative efforts were inadequate [43]. Other factors that contributed to adverse outcomes were:
●Inadequate and inconsistent physiologic monitoring
●Inadequate medical evaluation before sedation
●No independent observer
●Medication errors
●Inadequate recovery procedures
Adverse sedation events occur with all routes of administration and classes of medication, including those considered to have minimal effect on breathing. Poor outcomes also have been associated with excessive doses, drug interactions, administration by personnel without medical training, and, after discharge, drugs with long half-lives [44].
Failed sedation that prevents completion of the procedure is another important adverse event. The frequency of failed sedation varies among studies and depends upon multiple factors. For example, inadequate sedation that prevented completion of the procedure occurred in 1 out of 338 sedations in a registry study of over 30,000 sedations performed in a variety of hospital settings at multiple centers [5]. A separate study that used the same registry found that the frequency of failed sedation with propofol during almost 50,000 procedures was 0.6 percent. Finally, in a study of almost 6300 pediatric sedations performed in the emergency department, 0.9 percent of procedures failed due to inadequate sedation, and in 4 percent of patients whose procedures were successful, the children actively resisted and were considered sedation failures.
Although evidence is limited, several patient factors may be associated with failed sedations, including presence of an upper respiratory tract infection, a history of obstructive sleep apnea or snoring, ASA class III status, older age, and obesity [45]. However, selection of medication and provider decisions about administration also appear to be important.
EFFICACY OF SEDATION — Previous studies have used successful completion of the procedure as the definition of "successful sedation." We feel that this definition fails to acknowledge the importance of the patient experience. In addition to completion of the procedure without adverse outcomes, high-quality sedation can only be achieved if the patient does not have unpleasant recall of the procedure and does not actively resist or require physical restraint [46]. Although a wide range of measures have been used to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of procedural sedation for children, outcomes that are valid and reliable have not been consistently employed [47]. We recommend using tools that, in addition to successful completion of the procedure, also take into account the patient and family experience such as the Pediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS) (table 4) [23] or Tracking and Reporting Outcomes of Procedural Sedation (TROOPS) to assess and document the quality and efficacy of sedation provided [48].
Sedation providers should recognize that there is ample evidence in the pediatric anesthesia literature involving behavior changes in children after surgery. These changes are assumed to be associated with the stress and pain that accompany surgical experiences. There is no literature to specifically describe the incidence of nature of behavior changes after procedural sedation, but it would be logical to assume that children who have extreme anxiety/stress or pain during a procedure due to inadequate sedation would be at significant risk of prolonged behavioral changes after procedures [49-55].
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES — Limited evidence suggests that implementation of hospital-wide guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia may decrease the incidence of adverse events and adverse outcomes. As an example, hospital-wide implementation of national sedation and analgesia guidelines in one children's hospital resulted in a significant reduction in monthly adverse events during pediatric procedural sedation from 11 to 5 percent over three years (p <0.001) [56]. In order to make pediatric procedural sedation as safe as possible, institutions should develop protocols that specify a presedation evaluation, including a sedation plan, monitoring during the procedure and recovery, discharge and follow-up criteria, credentialing for personnel, and a quality improvement monitoring mechanism.
Detailed and effective communication between healthcare providers and across services is also essential to the safe practice of procedural sedation. Protocols should include procedures for transferring care of sedated children. Specific information regarding medications received during the sedation with doses, times, and response should be included with the usual details of the medical history, daily medications, allergies and vital signs.
Finally, health care providers who perform procedural sedation in children should have strong resuscitation and advanced pediatric life support skills, including advanced training in the assessment and management of the pediatric airway as well as specific training in pediatric procedural sedation.
SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Procedural sedation in children".)
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●There are no absolute indications for the performance of procedural sedation in children. It may be used for any procedure in which a child's pain or anxiety may be excessive and movement may impede performance. The need for sedation will vary greatly with a child's developmental or behavioral status. (See 'Indications' above.)
●The necessary preparation for safely performing procedural sedation in children is discussed separately. (See "Preparation for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
●The properties of the specific agents with respect to pediatric sedation are listed in the tables and discussed in detail separately (table 1 and table 2). (See "Pharmacologic agents for pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room".)
●Relative contraindications to procedural sedation include signs of a difficult airway or significant medical comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification III or higher). Those patients with ASA classes III, IV, and V (table 3), special needs, sleep apnea, decreased gastrointestinal motility, or airway abnormalities warrant consultation with a pediatric anesthesiologist or clinician with similar pediatric sedation expertise. (See 'Contraindications and precautions' above.)
●Nonpharmacologic interventions, particularly distraction techniques, may relieve children's anxiety and pain distress before and during procedures and should be incorporated into pediatric procedural sedation whenever possible. (See 'Nonpharmacologic interventions' above.)
●We suggest the use of supplemental oxygen with continuous capnography prior to and during procedural sedation (Grade 2C). (See 'Preoxygenation' above.)
●Appropriate monitoring during pediatric sedation includes visual observation, initial and repeated measurements of vital signs, and continuous measurement of heart rate and pulse oximetry. We recommend that patients receiving moderate or deep procedural sedation also undergo monitoring with end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) detection throughout the procedure and during recovery when possible. (See 'Monitoring' above and "Carbon dioxide monitoring (capnography)", section on 'Procedural sedation'.)
●We suggest the use of the Pediatric Sedation State Scale (table 4) to provide a simple means of effectively documenting and rapidly communicating the quality of pediatric sedation. (See 'Sedation state' above.)
●Monitoring should continue until the child meets criteria for safe discharge. The criteria are provided above. Young infants or children who are handicapped should return to the level of responsiveness observed before sedation. The exact duration of recovery time will vary with the nature of the patient (eg, age or body mass index) and the sedative agent or agents used (table 1 and table 2). (See 'Recovery care and discharge criteria' above.)
●Because of the significant risk of apnea after sedation, term infants with postconceptual ages (PCA) ≤45 weeks and former premature infants with PCA <60 weeks should undergo prolonged observation of respiratory status prior to discharge. (See 'Recovery care and discharge criteria' above.)
●In order to perform pediatric procedural sedation as safely as possible, institutions should develop protocols that specify:
•Pre-sedation evaluation, including a sedation plan
•Monitoring during the procedure and recovery
•Discharge and follow-up criteria
•Development of dedicated sedation teams
•Credentialing for personnel and a quality improvement monitoring mechanism (see 'Adverse outcomes' above)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Deborah C Hsu, MD, MEd, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.
1 : Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
2 : Current status of pain management in children.
3 : Procedural sedation and analgesia in children.
4 : Review of pediatric sedation.
5 : Incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room: report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium.
6 : Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Emergency Department Procedural Sedation for Children.
7 : Impact of provider specialty on pediatric procedural sedation complication rates.
8 : Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures.
9 : Behavioral and cognitive interventions in the treatment of pain in children.
10 : Pediatric procedural pain.
11 : Behavioral approaches to anxiety and pain management for pediatric venous access.
12 : Managing the Frightened Child.
13 : Managing the Frightened Child.
14 : Unscheduled Procedural Sedation: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Practice Guideline.
15 : Procedural sedation: providing the missing definition.
16 : Sedation provider practice variation: a survey analysis of pediatric emergency subspecialists and fellows.
17 : Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology.
18 : Supplemental oxygen during propofol sedation: yes or no?
19 : Monitoring preoxygenation.
20 : Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry.
21 : Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.
22 : Effect of age and sedative agent on the accuracy of bispectral index in detecting depth of sedation in children.
23 : Validation of the Pediatric Sedation State Scale.
24 : VIDEOS IN CLINICAL MEDICINE. Managing Procedural Anxiety in Children.
25 : Beyond the drugs: nonpharmacologic strategies to optimize procedural care in children.
26 : Managing pain and distress in children undergoing brief diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
27 : Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans.
28 : Blowing away shot pain: a technique for pain management during immunization.
29 : Virtual Reality for Pediatric Needle Procedural Pain: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.
30 : Evaluation of nonpharmacologic methods of pain and anxiety management for laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department.
31 : Using a tablet computer during pediatric procedures: a case series and review of the "apps".
32 : Child life services.
33 : An experimental evaluation of a model child life program.
34 : Practice MRI: reducing the need for sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI.
35 : Making MR imaging child's play - pediatric neuroimaging protocol, guidelines and procedure.
36 : A program to decrease the need for pediatric sedation for CT and MRI
37 : Incorporating psychological approaches into routine paediatric venepuncture.
38 : American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Hospital Care. Child life services.
39 : Sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in children and young people: summary of NICE guidance.
40 : When is a patient safe for discharge after procedural sedation? The timing of adverse effect events in 1367 pediatric procedural sedations.
41 : Can we improve the assessment of discharge readiness?: A comparative study of observational and objective measures of depth of sedation in children.
42 : The former preterm infant and risk of post-operative apnoea: recommendations for management.
43 : Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors.
44 : Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation.
45 : Risk factors leading to failed procedural sedation in children outside the operating room.
46 : Consensus-based recommendations for standardizing terminology and reporting adverse events for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children.
47 : Efficacy Outcome Measures for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review.
48 : Tracking and Reporting Outcomes Of Procedural Sedation (TROOPS): Standardized Quality Improvement and Research Tools from the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation.
49 : Beyond pain: predictors of postoperative maladaptive behavior change in children.
50 : A cohort study of the incidence and risk factors for negative behavior changes in children after general anesthesia.
51 : Preoperative anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes.
52 : Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes.
53 : Preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and behavioral recovery in young children undergoing surgery.
54 : Ethnicity and parental report of postoperative behavioral changes in children.
55 : Postoperative behavioral outcomes in children: effects of sedative premedication.
56 : Effect on hospital-wide sedation practices after implementation of the 2001 JCAHO procedural sedation and analgesia guidelines.